Not a bad idea at all

tagged , , , , , , and

So about those Muslim-only no-go areas we keep hearing about?

This Brit suggests a simple enough solution: go there.

Mr. Cunningham and Mr. Abraham have fired the first shots in the counter-jihad: they are demanding a full and unreserved written apology from , and have given notice that they regard this incident as a breach of their convention rights under the 1998 Human Rights Act. They are supported by the pressure group, and by , which plans to leaflet the area this weekend.

Outside this immediate battle, how do we fight the territorial expansion of ? My answer is simply not to accept that there are “no-go areas”: just go there. , writing recently in the on the dangers of walking around late at night, makes points that apply to all “no-go areas,” Muslim or not:

I am not foolhardy; I stay away from alleys and don’t flash jewelery. But I know parts of London in particular to be increasingly dangerous, and with growing caution comes growing rage. I will not be kept cringing indoors, not by day or night; nor should any man or woman in a free country.

It was another woman, , who said: “Nobody can make you feel inferior without your permission.” So we, men and women, should not grant that permission, and should not pander to the assumed superiority of those who would intimidate us, whether thugs or Muslims or both.

Turning to “Muslim no-go areas”, here is my advice: just go there. Look those niqab-clad women in the eye — it is all you can look them in — and raise a quizzical eyebrow at their alien garb.

Look with contempt at their “masters” swaggering along in jeans two steps in front of them.

Above all, just go there.

To this, I might add: while you’re at it, take your dog for a walk, and have a stopover at your favourite place to purchase liquor. And don’t forget to pick up that rasher of bacon on the way, too!

in-soviet-russia.png

 
 
No Comments »

“Why did we have to wait for Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali…?”

tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and

This is the question that bothers Peter Hitchens this week, and it’s a good one to reflect on given the recent confrontation with police had by Christian preachers Arthur Cunningham and Joseph Abraham, who were told by police officers that the area in which they were handing out literature was a Muslim community, that their evangelism was a “hate crime,” and that if they returned to the area ever again and were perchance beaten…well, they’d already been warned.

A police constable who was present during the incident in the area of is also alleged to have told the preachers not to return to the district.

It comes amid growing concern over the development of ic ‘no-go areas’.

The preachers, Americans and , are demanding an apology and compensation from .

They say their treatment breaks the , which guarantees freedom of religious expression.

The preachers, who have the backing of the pressure group, say they will take the force to court for breaching their if they don’t receive an apology.

They have accused the officer, PCSO , of behaving in an ‘aggressive and threatening’ manner. A complaint by their lawyers said he interrupted as they spoke to Muslim youths about their beliefs.

Mr Abraham, 65, who was born a Muslim in and is a convert to , said: ‘He told us we were trying to convert Muslims to Christianity and that that was a hate crime.

‘He was very intimidating and it concerns me that somebody holding his views can become a police officer, albeit at PCSO level.’

Mr Cunningham, 48, a fellow n Baptist missionary, said: ‘He realised we were Americans and then started ranting at us about George Bush and American foreign policy.

‘He said we were in a Muslim area and were not allowed to spread our Christian message. He said he was going to take us to the police station.’

At any rate, — the sane Hitchens brother, mind — muses thusly:

Why did we have to wait for Bishop , born and raised in Muslim , to remind us that, as he put it, ‘the beliefs, values and virtues of have been formed by the Christian faith’?

Just as important, why did we have to wait for him to urge us to do something about restoring that faith before we either sink into a yelling chaos of knives, fists and boots, or swoon into the strong, implacable arms of Islam?

Most of our homegrown prelates are more interested in or in spreading doubt about the gospel or urging the adoption of law.

Then again, why did it take the French President, , to explain to us that our parliamentary system was the best guarantee of liberty in the world and to remind us of the courage and valour of our people in war?

This is not what British leaders say or even think, not least because they are busy pulling the constitution to pieces.

It is not what our children are taught in schools.

In fact, any expression of national pride is viewed with suspicion by the state, by the education system and above all by the .

It was not always so. Half a century ago, we had churchmen, broadcasters, academics and military men who thought it normal to love their own country, normal to support the Christian faith which made us what we are, and were willing to defend it.

The question of what happened in the years between is one of the most interesting in history.

I suggest reading the whole thing — it isn’t terribly long, but is a good summation of just what has gone wrong with modern .

There was a time when the British had the gumption and courage to stand up to all manner of menaces, internal and foreign alike, and when the British people took pride in their nation. Those days would seem to have expired, as Britain sinks more and more into two separate chasms: that of rampant, primitive and violent Islam in its immigrant communities, and that of demoralized, nihilistic everywhere else. And the latter does not have the desire, strength, or courage to resist the advance of the former.

Update: Welcome, Steynians!

2 Comments »