If only women could be teachers! If only we stopped imposing a rigid, inflexible regime of upon those who educate our children, we could stop this horrid torrent of !

Yet another teacher — this time, a lesbian — is caught with a student (also female).

You know, this suddenly recollects to me the fact that my high school apparently had a cheer team at one point prior to my term as a student there. I never could get a straight answer about why it, and the lady who had coached it, had vanished from the map (so to speak).

Canada’s road to polygamous immigration:

    Well, we’ve been here once before. For the last couple of years, has been taking the first tentative steps toward normalization in .

In May 2006 a Government funded study recommended that polygamy be legalized and [suggested that] criminalizing polygamy (?) could lead to damage to the women and children in such relationships. Also in May of 2006 it was discovered that the former governing Liberal Party “recognized polygamous relationships for limited purposes to enforce the financial obligations of husbands”…

    Of course, how we in Canada can continue to object to polygamy — when we have already shot ourselves in the foot several times over (i.e. if the gender of the participants in a marriage doesn’t matter, why does the quantity of participants matter? Also, if we tolerate swingers, why not extend the same openness to multiple marriages?) — is something of a mystery, and I imagine that before too long we’ll see the legal proscriptions against it struck down by a Canadian court.

    Chances are the plaintiff in the relevant case will be a Muslim, methinks.

It’s just getting better all the time:

    It seems that the reforms to the will actually make the even worse than it already is — maximum awardable damages are being increased (or the limitations are being removed entirely), and the new “direct access model” for the tribunal will actually speed up the time it takes for the show trials to begin.

Like a raging, staggering drunk, the s are simply spiralling out of control. No grip on reality. Incoherent. Completely lost.

    What a bloody scam. It reminds me of that joke about the reforms to law in : “Other states are getting rid of the death penalty; mah states puttin’ in an express lane!”

The error that dare not speak its name

    takes home the “Best Title of an Arbitrary Long Period of Time” aware for his play on the colloquial phrase for as he puts down his vote for what Canada’s biggest mistake was: allowing gay marriage.

What makes the national mistake of legalizing same-sex marriage unique in Canadian history is that to even discuss the issue is considered by many, particularly our elites, to be at the very least in extraordinarily bad taste. Although this is a valid and vital debate about social policy, anyone critiquing the status quo is likely to be marginalized as hateful, extreme or simply mad. Social conservatives aren’t just wrong, they’re evil.

The discussion, we are told, is over. Which is what triumphalist bullies have said for centuries after they win a battle. In this case, the intention is to marginalize anyone who dares to still speak out. In other words, to silence them.

Indeed, the deconstruction of marriage began not with the gay community asking for the right to marry but with the heterosexual world rejecting it. The term “common-law ” said it all. Marriage is many things, but it is never common. Yet with this semantic and legal revolution, desire and convenience replaced commitment and dedication. The qualifications, so to speak, were lowered.

And one does indeed have to qualify for marriage; just as one has, for example, to qualify for a pension or a military medal. People who have not reached the age of retirement don’t qualify for a pension, people who don’t serve in the Armed Forces don’t qualify for a military medal. It’s not a question of equality but requirement. A human right is intrinsic, a social institution is not.

The four great and historic qualifications for marriage always have been number, gender, age and blood. Two people, male and female, over a certain age and not closely related. Mainstream and responsible societies have sometimes changed the age of maturity, but incest has always been condemned and, by its nature, died out because of retardation.

As for polygamy, it’s making something of a comeback…

    And in other parts of the world, is slowly becoming “normalized.” , sex, sex…it’s like all our post-Christian society cares to worry its head about is sex. And yet, strangely, the birthrate in most Western nations is staggeringly low.

History of Airplanes

    Interesting initiative to provide “historical sketches of every aircraft ever built.” Might as well try to end on a lighter note, O Reader!

in-soviet-russia.png

 

British scientists are ready to turn female into , cutting out of the process of creating life.

The breakthrough paves the way for lesbian couples to have children that are biologically their own.

Gay men could follow suit by using the technique to make eggs from male bone marrow. [but there's still the whole problem of carrying the child; I guess gay men will never truly be able to have a baby all their own -- Ken]

Researchers at say their technique will help lead to new treatments for .

But critics warn that it sidelines men and raises the prospect of babies being born through entirely artificial means.

The research centres around - the body’s ‘mother’ cells which can turn into any other type of cell.

According to magazine, the scientists want to take stem cells from a woman donor’s bone marrow and transform them into sperm through the use of special chemicals and vitamins.

There is one upshot to this field of research:

Taking stem cells from an adult donor — possibly a patient — removes the ethical problems associated with using embryos.

Does it? I guess, in one sense, yes…although given other recent developments, there is always the possibility of new ethical problems emerging. Because I’m sure nobody would ever think to harvest bone marrow and stem cells from cancer patients without their express approval, right?

My goodness but these are strange times we live in. Whatever happened to having a baby the normal way…you know, the biologically normal way? One guy, one girl, sexual intercourse…you know, the way every other mammal does it?

Oh, right…that’s why we have .