The Shaidle passes along the details that the Cat Who Has Achieved Ignition has unearthed concerning , and it’s about as disgusting and hypocritical as one has come to expect from a “culture”-oriented department of the government of .

magazine is indeed on a watch list after an unnamed activist lodged a complaint (correct: somebody other than ) against it. By and large, as BCF has learned, the material in the complaint was the same as the list of evidence brought before — and later dismissed by — the in Mr. Wells’ complaint against the publication.

BCF provides scans of letters sent to and from Heritage Canada. The first letter is from the complainant, whining about the “slow pace of action on the Catholic Insight file.” It is in the second letter that the order to Catholic Insight to provide advance copies of their publication for “monitoring purposes” is given. A third letter cautions Catholic Insight against the act of denigrating homosexuals.

Let’s be clear. Catholic Insight does nothing other than communicate ’s position on issues, not all of which are related to , much less to . But it must submit its content for advance screening — risking its access to postal subsidies if it does not pass the censor’s approval. We can argue about the lameness of accepting Caesar’s money and then using it to step on his toes from time to time*, but we can also ask about the priorities of this government department.

Because while Catholic teaching is subject to a censor’s advance approval, exhibitionist homosexuals demonstrating fellatio to a young child is evidently just fine and dandy (ahem) with Heritage Canada. Equally, a movie about boxing and masturbation gets the green light, in the form of tens of thousands of Heritage Canada dollars “proudly” given in sponsorship of InsideOut Gay and Lesbian Film Festival, in .

Welcome to Canada. The Church has kind of lost favour in our noble sight, but the high art of paedophilia is gaining ground all the time.

* this is twice now that the Shaidle has linked to my “Caesar” comment, causing (each time) the predictable spikes in traffic that attend a link from one of the hottest blogs in Canada. Very cool.

This is something I missed when I noted, yesterday, that is evidently moving to appeal the rejection of his complaint against magazine by the .

It would appear that Catholic Insight has been placed on the ‘watch list’ — that is, the magazine has been flagged as potentially having “questionable content”, and must submit each issue to a Heritage Canada panel for approval and “screening” prior to publishing.

Now, I’m on record elsewhere saying that I don’t much like it when people align themselves with Caesar and then complain that he’s acting too Roman for their tastes. And since Catholic Insight does accept Heritage Canada money, they have unfortunately opened themselves to this state of affairs — one never gets to lead when one takes Caesar as a dance partner.

That’s not to say that I think Heritage Canada is justified in supporting a course of action that amounts to little more than , of course. The government is not in the right here, and I completely agree with BCF’s observation that the whole situation reeks of a kind of “cultural Marxism.” There would appear to be an implied threat that Catholic Insight could find its funding cut off if it publishes something that the censors object to.

Ultimately, it’s the fact that we even have censors working to limit the expression of opinion in this country that is the really terrible thing, and the thing which most needs to change. It would be nice if Catholic Insight could find an alternative source of funding, as well, so that it wouldn’t be so beholden to the whims of others, but…well…who ever said the world was perfect?

Update: Welcome, 5FoF and BCF readers, and Steynians!