Of course, not all is well in Britain

tagged , , , , , and

’s remarks aside, not all is well in . This may just be the most insane thing I’ve ever heard, and it doesn’t even have anything to do with !

A council has been accused of discriminating against s over plans to clear undergrowth from a notorious gay cruising spot.

City Council wants to prune bushes and remove cover from an area known as the Downs to improve the landscape and encourage rare wildlife.

But its own gay rights group has opposed the move, claiming that cutting back the bushes was “discriminating” to homosexual men who used the area for late night outdoor known as dogging.

To which, I think, the best comment that can be made is:

…it would be a THREAT TO GAY RIGHTS if you made it harder for them to bone each other where children may come across them. I just don’t think I’ve ever beheld a more perfected set of priorities in my entire stupid bigoted American life.

Lawn and garden maintenance is now an anti-homosexual hate crime in . It is more important that gay couples be provided with underbrush in which to hide their late-night sexual antics than it is for a town council to arrange for someone to trim the verge on public property.

Some things are just to absurd to be fiction. This one is totally going in the “Asteroid Overdue” category.

Update: Ace sums it up rather well: “Britain is the Florida of Europe.”

1 Comment »

It needed to be said

tagged , , and

I don’t know what to think of . Peter Hitchens, whom I use as a barometer of conservative attitude in , doesn’t seem to think much of the leader of ’s conservatives, and if memory serves Cameron has made more than a few major gaffes that have seen him tarred as a social liberal.

Still, here he is saying what needs to be said, and perhaps repeated very often indeed.

‘We as a society have been far too sensitive. In order to avoid injury to people’s feelings, in order to avoid appearing judgemental, we have failed to say what needs to be said. We have seen a decades-long erosion of responsibility, of social virtue, of self-discipline, respect for others, deferring gratification instead of instant gratification.

“‘Instead we prefer moral neutrality, a refusal to make judgments about what is good and bad behaviour, right and wrong behaviour. Bad. Good. Right. Wrong. These are words that our political system and our public sector scarcely dare use any more.’”

“We talk about people being ‘at risk of obesity’ instead of talking about people who eat too much and take too little exercise. We talk about people being at risk of poverty, or social exclusion: it’s as if these things - obesity, alcohol abuse, drug addiction - are purely external events like a plague or bad weather.

“Of course, circumstances - where you are born, your neighbourhood, your school, and the choices your parents make - have a huge impact. But social problems are often the consequence of the choices that people make.”

He added: “There is a danger of becoming quite literally a de-moralised society, where nobody will tell the truth anymore about what is good and bad, right and wrong. That is why children are growing up without boundaries, thinking they can do as they please, and why no adult will intervene to stop them - including, often, their parents. If we are going to get any where near solving some of these problems, that has to stop.”

One word: responsibility. Our society seems paralzyed with fear of it. Fewer and fewer people want to admit that they are responsible for e.g. their own weight, for their own sexuality, for their own health, and for the consequences of activities that transgress against the normal ordered function of one or more of those things. Fewer and fewer people want to admit that they are responsible for educating their offspring in areas such as manners and morality. Fewer and fewer people want to do anything other than find some faceless “other” to blame for all that afflicts them, without ever once pausing to consider all that they have done to affect themselves.

It’s nice, then, that at least a few people in power still have the guts to call us out on such matters.

Update: Perhaps predictably, Peter Hitchens looks askance at Mr. Cameron’s statement:

You must have seen the gloopy sighs of praise and wonder from gullible ‘commentators’ who have learned nothing from the 11-year Blair-Brown fraud (remember ‘tough on crime’?). There wasn’t a single specific pledge.

He pretended to attack moral neutrality, saying: ‘Bad. Good. Right. Wrong. These are words that our political system and our public sector scarcely dare use any more.’

I decided to see if he would dare use them himself.

So I asked his Press office if he would care to say if the following were right or wrong, bad or good: taking illegal drugs; owning up to taking illegal drugs and saying it was wrong; living together while not being married; punishing criminals.

And do you know? There was no answer.

With benefit of hindsight, this was probably predictable. Rare indeed is the politician who can be taken at his word.

No Comments »