New colour scheme

July 18, 2008

Just trying something different, really, and seeing if the site face can be brightened up at all. Questions, comments, concerns, and complaints can be submitted via the contact form, via the link at the bottom of this posting.

The actual layout is the same; I just modified the of Brian Veloso’s “ChaoticSoul” template to give it a lighter, and theoretically more readable, look.

Layout change

July 17, 2008

Because I felt like messing with the site layout a bit, the good Reader should note a moderate change to the template. Basically, everything is more or less the same, save that the Pic of the Day (which was already automatically the top post on the site anyhow) has been moved above the main content area and sidebar. I think it looks a bit better this way myself — the idea was always to make the picture the priority, anyhow, and this revision achieves that a bit better.

Reader Mail: DDT

March 18, 2008

What do you do, O Reader, when the discussion just isn’t going your way? Some people bow out gracefully, others concede a point or two, and others try and shift their angle of attack. Apparently, however, if you’re Ed Darrell, you abandon all pretense of rational discussion and fling a little mud.

Your nearly impossible to read comments box, your not posting remarks unedited by you, and your intransigence in repeatedly posting “citations”from the avoiwed liar suggest this is not the place to carry on a discussion.

I had hoped you’d bother to read what I wrote, and follow my links, after I followed yours and was so sorely disappinted.

Milloy is a liar. You obviously have never bothered to try to track down his citations — they can’t be tracked. Those aren’t citations. They are primates flinging feces.

Alas.

If anyone has a question as to whether or not I post remarks unedited by me, I’ll be more than happy to provide the original emails that arrived in my inbox. I sometimes — very occasionally — correct spelling mistakes in what arrives, but only if the error is egregious and would serve only to embarrass the sender. But apart from those rare instances, what I display for the Reader in these postings is the unedited text of the original message that I receive. The only parts of the message which get redacted are the sender’s email address, IP address, and ISP information.

And as I say, I have backup copies of all the original emails to prove that with, which I can easily display upon request.

As to the complaint about the contact form being a bit hard to read — well, it’s not hard for me to read, and nobody else has yet complained. But the colour palette is a bit narrow, and for what it’s worth I’ve tracked down the relevant bits of and made a few modifications — textarea and input backgrounds are now darker, and the text is the same gold colour as the hyperlinks.

There, that sets aside Ed’s form criticisms. Now, let’s look again at a more serious charge that he makes.

Just for fun, I went through the list of DDT factoids at Junk Science to see how easy it would be to verify some of the citations. Selecting citations at random, I tried to cross-reference them against Internet-available sources. Some of the older citations, I would have had to visit a library with a comprehensive database of old journals to obtain (and my ability to access the University of Alberta’s online journal services have been revoked due to my no longer being a student of that institution).

Others, however, were more easily tracked down. Here’s a handful of examples from the list of references that could be demonstrated as being accurate citations from works published in medical or scientific journals.

Now, all I’m doing by listing these here is demonstrating that it is Ed, currently, who can be shown conclusively to be a liar. Whether Steven Milloy is a liar or not is still up for discussion — certainly, Ed is convinced that Milloy is a liar of epic proportions, while I remain agnostic on the matter. But the above list demonstrates, conclusively, that Ed’s earlier statements (i.e. that no serious scientific publications have carried articles disputing ’s theories or the conclusions published in her book , and that Milloy’s citations can’t be tracked) are falsehoods.

To be clear: based on the above, it can be said now that Ed Darrel has been conclusively demonstrated to be a liar.

I have read a sampling of content at Ed’s site, and admittedly do enjoy some of his content (his commentary on Galileo — and the generally good relationship between and — is very reasonable, for example). And I would even go so far as to charitably suggest that he makes a convincing case for a multi-vectored solution to the problem of malaria; his advocacy for s is, I think, important (even if mosquito nets are an incomplete solution, as anyone with sufficient backcountry camping experience should know), and both passive and active methods of preventing s from reaching humans will be necessary in eradicating from the world.

To be completely fair, I’m no advocate for rampant use of any potentially toxic substance, but I do believe in using what works to solve a problem. worked in many countries; we should still consider it a valid part of the arsenal of methods we should employ in our efforts to eradicate malaria world-wide, especially since many of the effects it supposedly has — on humans and on avian species — have since been cast into doubt*. That’s not to say that DDT is the only weapon we should use in our struggle against this disease. But neither should we disallow its use as we have — millions have died for that mistake.

* And that would be another lie Ed is guilty of — his assertion that none of Rachel Carson’s conclusions have been successfully disputed.

Redesigning a website

February 20, 2008

So a while ago, I got annoyed with the layout of the company website. It’s not that it’s terrible, but let us be honest, O Reader: is a dated tool for website design, what with the emergence of s, and when one has to manage even irregular changes to a website that has translations from English into Spanish and Portuguese, it can be a tedious chore to maintain a consistent layout and template across the entire site.

Reliance on for navigation menus, especially in this age of security paranoia and server-side scripting, is also a bit of a faux pas.

So, basically on a whim, I decided to redesign the website in my spare time.

This is the old version of the site, a series of static pages composed primarily in Dreamweaver, and subsequently translated from into and .

cs_welcome_page.jpg

Advantages to this design are that it is more portable — we can stuff it on a CD to auto-run when a client inserts the disc into his computer, we can easily move it between servers without worrying about mundane things like databases, and for the most part it’s fast (being just raw text).

Disadvantages to this design, however, are that it just looks dated, like a fugitive from the 90s. Web design has moved ahead by leaps and bounds since the time this site was first given form, and so has web development technology — Dreamweaver has not really kept up with the times in this regard. The site is “table heavy”, and its use of is inconsistent; styles change across the different pages. Moreover, the template and formatting are not consistent between pages, or between identical pages in different languages. Text that is inside a table on a page in one language is found to be outside the table on the same page in a different language, for example. Also, the multi-language capability of the site is not well-implemented — clicking on one of the language options on the left sidebar always reverts the visitor to the index page for the new language. That can make navigation a bit tedious.

And, of course, it relies very heavily on JavaScript. Turn your security features to Medium or High in and see how well the site functions for you, O Reader.

Here’s the new version of the site that I’m going to propose to my managers. It uses the Joomla content management system (CMS).

cs_proposed.jpg

Disadvantages to this design are that it is less portable — because it uses a database-driven CMS, it cannot easily be stuffed onto a CD. That’s not a huge concern — I can save it as a series of static pages and make it work on CD easily enough — but it is an initial liability. Also, the URIs for the site aren’t nice, descriptive things like “approvals.html”, but are instead strings of variables. Not that most users pay strict attention to the address bar, of course, but still.

Advantages to this design, however, are that it looks cleaner, and frees us from the need to use Dreamweaver to maintain the site. Content management systems have administrative backends to them that allow for modifications to site content to be made online, from any computer in the world, at any time — that gives our marketing director (and the VP in charge of same) the ability to make changes to the site on an “as needed,” “on the fly” basis. The site uses DIVs primarily, with only a few tables, and also remains fairly lightweight and quick-loading. The CSS styles are consistent, and the width of the site is fixed rather than variable. There is also a vastly diminished reliance on JavaScript in the site’s interface, and an increased use of PHP, a server-side scripting language that is mostly unaffected by a user’s local security settings.

The big thing about the proposed design, though, is that the feature has “in place” functionality. If you’re browsing our products page in English and suddenly decide it would be easier to read in Spanish, selecting Spanish from the language dropdown at the top of the site won’t suddenly kick you to the index page all over again; you’ll still be looking at the products page, but the text will have switched to Spanish.

So far, the marketing director is on board with the redesign, and we have to present it to the VP of Sales and Marketing (and possibly the General Manager as well) at some point in the near future. Wish me luck, O Reader, in selling these changes to the company.

Note: the redesign doesn’t quite look right in the image here, which was captured using Paparazzi! for Mac, a “website screenshot” utility. Its web rendering engine is a bit primitive, so the language dropdown box looks out of place as a result. In reality, and in both and Internet Explorer, it is nicely aligned on the top bar, with the words “Select Language” snuggled in beside it.

 

Welcome to the new site!

February 7, 2006

web_links.jpg

You may have noticed that I’ve been something of an absentee over the past week and change. There are two reasons for that. The first (and not nearly as good) reason is that I’ve been busy with other stuff, most notably school. And indeed, that thing called “life” has in general kept me on my toes for much of the week. If you’re at all curious about what I’ve been up to, you can check out some of the recent activity at these other sites I run:

The other reason I’ve been kind of absent, besides being busy with those things above and with other things besides, is that I’ve been preparing a new website for launch!. That’s the site you’re looking at now, the product of a few months of design, testing, and refinement. But I think, at last, that I’ve got it where I want it, and so here it is, brand new and ready to rock.

So anyhow, you might be wondering why I went to the new site. There are a few reasons, not the least of which is that I thought it was time for a change. However, there were a few other considerations, some worth mention:

  • The move to the new site let me switch away from 4.5.0 and upgrade to Mambo 4.5.1. I realize that may not seem like a large version number increase, but believe me — it is. Mambo 4.5.1 offers me a larger degree of control over the site’s content and its display than 4.5.0 did, and it features more dynamic templates as well. Plus that, there are a few site components for 4.5.1 that weren’t available for 4.5.0. Chief among these are the Tip Jar and the Verse of the Day visible on the right sidebar.

    Please feel free to make use of the Tip Jar, especially! I can always use the help!

  • The opportunity to use a fixed-width, visually dazzling template was too good to pass up.
  • The Quote Machine was something I was able to re-adapt as an actual site module instead of simply inserting the extra PHP code into the sidebar in the actual page layout. That means I can move it around the site if I feel like it…and given that some of the random quotes are quite LONG, that may eventually happen.
  • The main domain page, www.timeimmortal.net, has sat empty for too long now, or rather has been un-used for too long. I’ve developed it out somewhat in the past, but in practice it’s only ever been an aggregator for other sites that I post to. And I’m going to re-implement that feature shortly, because that’s sort of an end goal of what the site is for as well — it will be my blog, and also where you can come for news snippets from other projects I work on.

    But for the moment, it was just important that I get the main site back in use.

And so the old site is officially “closed”, and will be maintained only for posterity. In the next week or so, I’ll be sending out emails to all the folks who link to me asking them to update their links (as it were), but in the meantime welcome to the new site, and I hope you enjoy it!