Ezra Levant has the details on an alarming story involving Richard Warman and a teenaged girl he exposed to the possibility of violence.
Quite a shocking thing for a supposed human rights crusader to do, no?
But then, one suspects that Warman, in particular, and his associates at the CHRC, don’t actually care about human rights as much as they do about a) their own pocketbooks, and b) silencing those with whom they personally disagree.
And now, it seems, we must add another entry to that list: c) settling personal vendettas.
Warman spent a lot of time posing as a neo-Nazi on various websites trying to coax out the identity of a high school girl who was led into the movement by her then-boyfriend. She ultimately recanted and apologized for ever espousing racist views, realizing that she had been led astray in her infatuation, and the CHRC accepted her statement and closed the case without imposing a monetary fine.
Perhaps because he had been denied another paycheque, Warman decided to leak the girl’s letter of recantation onto the Internet, and specifically onto a neo-Nazi web forum. These are people Warman believes hold views that might cause someone to come to harm — but to settle a score, he thought nothing of singling out, by name, someone who had gotten away.
That’s tantamount to incitement.
This sort of crap doesn’t belong in Canada.
Update: Welcome, Steynians!
